Browse Search Feedback Other Links Home Home The Talk.Origins Archive: Exploring the Creation/Evolution Controversy

Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District

Plaintiffs' Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

[Posted: December 8, 2005]
Up
Dover Home
Next
Next

[This document was prepared after the Kitzmiller et al. v. Dover Area School District et al. trial by the lawyers for the plaintiffs. They favor the teaching of evolution and oppose the teaching of intelligent design in science classrooms of public schools. It details how they propose the judge rule in this case.]

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TAMMY KITZMILLER; BRYAN AND
CHRISTY REHM; DEBORAH FENIMORE
AND JOEL LIEB; STEVEN STOUGH;
BETH EVELAND; CYNTHIA SNEATH;
JULIE SMITH; AND ARALENE
("BARRIE") D. AND FREDERICK B.
CALLAHAN,

                             Plaintiffs

vs.

DOVER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT;
DOVER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS,

                             Defendants
  :  
  :  
  :  
  :  
  :  
  :  
  :  
  :  
  :  
  :  
  :  
  :  
  :  
  :  
  :  
  :  
  :  







CIVIL ACTION


No. 4:04-cv-2688

(JUDGE JONES)


(Filed Electronically)

PLAINTIFFS' FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Up
Dover Home
Next
Next

Home Browse Search Feedback Other Links The FAQ Must-Read Files Index Evolution Creationism Age of the Earth Flood Geology Catastrophism Debates
Home Page | Browse | Search | Feedback | Links
The FAQ | Must-Read Files | Index | Creationism | Evolution | Age of the Earth | Flood Geology | Catastrophism | Debates