[This document was prepared after the Kitzmiller et al. v. Dover Area School District et al. trial by the lawyers for the plaintiffs. They favor the teaching of evolution and oppose the teaching of intelligent design in science classrooms of public schools. It details how they propose the judge rule in this case.]
TAMMY KITZMILLER; BRYAN AND CHRISTY REHM; DEBORAH FENIMORE AND JOEL LIEB; STEVEN STOUGH; BETH EVELAND; CYNTHIA SNEATH; JULIE SMITH; AND ARALENE ("BARRIE") D. AND FREDERICK B. CALLAHAN, Plaintiffs vs. DOVER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT; DOVER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS, Defendants |
: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : |
CIVIL ACTION No. 4:04-cv-2688 (JUDGE JONES) (Filed Electronically) |
Other Links:
|
Plaintiffs request that the Court adopt the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law based on the evidence adduced at trial. Plaintiffs' detailed findings of fact are summarized in the ultimate findings of fact on pages 141-48. Legal authority and argument supporting the Conclusions of Law are set forth in the accompanying Memorandum of Law.
Home Page | Browse | Search | Feedback | Links |
The FAQ | Must-Read Files | Index | Creationism | Evolution | Age of the Earth | Flood Geology | Catastrophism | Debates |