Other Links:
|
ince the time of the Great Renaming, which changed net.origins to talk.origins, Ted Holden has been repeatedly posting the claim that sauropod dinosaurs were too large to have existed in 1g acceleration. His argument is based on simple square-cube scaling of human weightlifter performance (in particular, the performance of Bill Kazmaier). His conclusion is that nothing larger than an elephant is possible in 1g. His proposed solution is a "reduction in the felt effect of gravity" (by which he seems to mean the effective acceleration), due to a variant of Velikovskian Catastrophism, often called Saturnism. Ted's materials in their current form can be found on his web pages dealing with catastrophism.
Ted's arguments are largely faulty. There are many different ways that the validity of Ted's argument can be checked. Here are just a few.
[Next] |
Abstract: The upper mass limit to terrestrial animals is studied using physical arguments and allometric laws for bone and muscle strength and animal locomotion. The limit is suggested to lie between 10^5 and 10^6 kg. A possibility for a still larger mass, in case of new adaptations, is not excluded.
(Very good general overview of many of the issues, with references to more detailed studies in published papers. Addresses issues of flying giants such as pterosaur and teratorn also.)
(The source of much of Ted's material, including his overestimate of ultrasaurus mass, but interestingly, McGowan also provides answers to some of Ted's supposed stumpers, such as how could the sauropods possibly support their necks (nuchal ligaments), or why haven't many animals gotten as large as sauropods (environmental factors, gizzards, fermenting stomachs, and so on).)
(addresses issues of gait, predation, and strength in T.Rex)
(updated and reissued as "Dinosaurs Rediscovered" in 1993) (Contains interviews with Jensen, MacIntosh, and Gillette about the finds of the very largest sauropods)
(a plodding textbook, but contains the best information as of the time of its publication) (in particular, the overview of the sauropods is written by John MacIntosh, for whom ultrasaurus macintoshi was named by Jensen)
(Bakker's work is controversial, but he presents sketchy evidence that muscle and bone cross sectional strengths of dinosaurs make them not only plausible in 1g, but agile.)
(especially note the paper on morphology of plateosaurus by Weischapel: has an interesting diagram of the tendon attachment point, an example of improved leverage over more normal structures) (also the paper on species determination in sauropods was written by John MacIntosh, and illustrates the folly of scaling sauropod masses by note-to-tailtip lengths, as these vary greatly even among fairly closely related species)
(collection of papers)
(A "coffee table book" I browsed through. Contains some photos of the site, images of recovered bones, and some qualitative information, eg, on the exaggerated features for weightbearing relative to diplodocus.)
[GALE] "Grzimek's Animal
Life Encyclopedia"
Van Norstram Reinhold Co. New York 1975
[AF&F] Gerald L. Wood
"Animal Facts and Feats"
Sterling Publishing Co. New York 1978
[E&TH] Laws, Parker and
Johnstone "Elephants and their Habitats"
Laws, Parker and Johnstone Clarendon Press Oxford 1975
[NHotAE] Sikes "Natural
History of the African Elephant"
American Elsevier Publishing Co. New York 1971
[tAE] DiSilvestro "The
African Elephant: Twilight in Eden"
John Wiley & Sons, inc (for the National Audubon
Society) New York 1991
[GBR] "The Guiness Book of
Records"
1994 edition
[tHM] Alexander "The Human
Machine"
Columbio University Press
[AM] Alexander "Animal
Mechanics"
University of Washington Press
[WASI] Knut Nielson's,
"Scaling, Why is Animal size So Important",
Cambridge Univ Press, 1984
Home Page | Browse | Search | Feedback | Links |
The FAQ | Must-Read Files | Index | Creationism | Evolution | Age of the Earth | Flood Geology | Catastrophism | Debates |