Article 251916 of talk.origins: From: jimf@vangelis.co.symbios.com (Jim Foley) Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: Still waiting for some evidence Date: 10 Jun 1997 15:05:27 -0400 Message-ID: <5nk8ik$97j@herald.ks.symbios.com> In article <33996ae1.8756375@news.sunlink.net>, Ed Conrad <edconrad@sunlink.net> wrote: >Look at me! >I'm STILL WAITING FOR SOME EVIDENCE >(of man's inhuman ancestry) >to back up the evolutionists' contention. What do you consider the following to be? http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/sts5.jpg http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/oh24.jpg http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/1813.jpg http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/java.jpg http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/1470.jpg http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/3733.jpg http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/15000_side.jpg Brief information on all these is available at http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/specimen.html -- Jim (Chris) Foley, jim.foley@symbios.com Assoc. Prof. of Omphalic Envy Research interest: Department of Anthropology Primitive hominids University of Ediacara (Australopithecus creationistii) Article 262936 of talk.origins: From: jim.foley@NOSPAM_symbios.com Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: Now, let's see? WHERE were we? Date: 9 Sep 1997 18:08:25 -0400 Message-ID: <5v4fgg$55n@herald.ks.symbios.com> In article <3413d8dc.6019681@news.sunlink.net>, Ed Conrad <conrad@sunlink.net> wrote: >Oh, yes! >Now I remember! >A few weeks ago, I politely asked if anyone out there could kindly >supply some none-rhetorical undisputable physical evidence that man >evolved from inhuman primates. Odd, I replied to a similar request from you back on June 10th, and my post was ignored. So let me try again. What do you consider the following to be? http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/sts5.jpg http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/oh24.jpg http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/1813.jpg http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/java.jpg http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/1470.jpg http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/3733.jpg http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/15000_side.jpg Brief information on all these is available at http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/specimen.html -- Jim Foley jim.foley@NOSPAM_symbios.com Assoc. Prof. of Omphalic Envy Research interest: Department of Anthropology Primitive hominids University of Ediacara (Australopithecus creationistii) Article 266178 of talk.origins: From: jim.foley@NOSPAM_symbios.com Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: Gutless N.Y Times, Washington Post -- Kook EC-022 Date: 1 Oct 1997 16:45:24 -0400 Message-ID: <60u9s3$cgv@herald.ks.symbios.com> In article <342cf5fd.7633251@news.sunlink.net>, Ed Conrad <conrad@sunlink.net> wrote: >I mean, after all, it is an established fact that these Howlers >possess no physical evidence of any shape, form or kind to back >their claim of an evolutionary stepladder ascent by inhuman cat-size, >monkey-like primates of 65 million years ago (as the scientific >textbooks so incorrectly maintain) to Homo sapiens sapiens. What do you consider the following to be? http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/sts5.jpg http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/oh24.jpg http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/1813.jpg http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/java.jpg http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/1470.jpg http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/3733.jpg http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/15000_side.jpg Brief information on all these is available at http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/specimen.html >When I ask any of them to produce even as little as a scintilla >of undeniable proof, I wind up getting a lot of hot air. Odd, I've posted the above twice so far and gotten no response. -- Jim Foley jim.foley@NOSPAM_symbios.com Assoc. Prof. of Omphalic Envy Research interest: Department of Anthropology Primitive hominids University of Ediacara (Australopithecus creationistii) Article 267965 of talk.origins: From: edconrad@sunlink.net (Ed Conrad) Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: Truth AND Consequences -- Kook EC-032 Date: 13 Oct 1997 20:14:08 -0400 Message-ID: <3442b6ae.6525748@news.sunlink.net> On 9 Oct 1997, jim.foley@NOSPAM_symbios.com wrote: >Ed Conrad <conrad@sunlink.net> wrote: > >> May I take the liberty of informing you that there is nary a scintilla >> of undeniable physical evidence backing up the scientific >> establishment's insistence that man had evolved from the lowliest >> primates of 65 million years ago. > > In that case, what are the following? > > http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/sts5.jpg Cow manure? > http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/oh24.jpg Horse manure? > http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/1813.jpg Turtle droppings? > http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/java.jpg Elephant dung? > http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/1470.jpg Ostrich outage! > http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/3733.jpg Pigeon poop? > http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/15000_side.jpg Dinosaur do-do? > Brief information on all these is available at > http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/specimen.html Thanks for the info, Jim. If we should decide to pay a visit, would you suggest that we bring along our own clothespin? ~~~~~~~ As I was saying before so rudely interrupted, there is *nary* a scintilla of undeniable physical evidence backing up the scientific establishment's insistence that man had evolved from the lowliest primates of 65 million years ago. The scientific establishment's boast that it indeed possesses such clear-cut evidence ranks as the biggest -- and longest running -- con job in all of science. To put it in monetary terms, it is approximately 35 cents short of a dollar. The scientific establishment possesses *no* such undisputed physical proof, only wishful thinking wrapped rather tightly -- rather loosely? -- around a whole lot of hot air. Ed Conrad edconrad@sunlink.net
This page is part of the Fossil Hominids FAQ at the talk.origins Archive.
Home Page |
Species |
Fossils |
Creationism |
Reading |
References
Illustrations |
What's New |
Feedback |
Search |
Links |
Fiction
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/conrad.html, 07/31/98
Copyright © Jim Foley
|| Email me