Claim CH503:
Noah's ark has been found at the Durupinar site near Dogubayazit, Turkey.
A symmetrical streamlined stone structure near there has the right
dimensions, and interior structure and symmetrically arranged traces of
metal are consistent with the ark. Also, anchor
stones have
been found near there.
Source:
Fasold, David, 1988. The Ark of Noah, New York: Knightsbridge
Publishing.
Wyatt, R. E., 1989. Discovered - Noah's Ark. Nashville, TN: World
Bible
Society. Also, Wyatt, R. E., 1994. "Discovered - Noah's Ark: Video
documentary of research and field work". Wyatt Archaeological Research,
713 Lambert Drive, Nashville, TN, 37220.
Response:
- The metal traces that were interpreted as iron brackets were actually
goethite, a hydrated iron oxide. This mineral was thoroughly mixed
with clay, calcite, quartz, and anthophyllite particles, and it showed
a large amount of chemical variability across the sample. Neither of
these properties would occur in smelted iron.
The purported walls of the ark are limonite concentrations. Their
boatlike shape is consistent with an eroded doubly plunging syncline.
The stresses of such folding commonly cause fractures that cut across
the layers. Water moving through these fractures would have produced
the limonite concentrations that were interpreted as dividing walls.
In short, the structure is consistent with the following geological
history:
- Rocks formed when sediments eroded from nearby volcanic rocks and
were compacted.
- These layers were folded into a doubly plunging syncline.
- A marine sea eroded a channel into the rocks and deposited
fossiliferous limestone in it.
- The land was uplifted, and erosion removed most of the limestone and
exposed the fold.
- A landslide carried blocks of rock and mud around the synclinal
structure.
This interpretation is consistent with the structure itself and with
the surrounding geology (Collins and Fasold 1996).
- No fossilized wood or traces of wood, reed, or elemental carbon were
found associated with the structure (Collins and Fasold 1996).
- The Durupinar site is incompatible with the biblical account. Genesis
8:4-6 says the flood waters receded for two and a half months after the
ark landed before other mountaintops became visible. The Durupinar
site is almost 10,000 feet lower than the summit of nearby Agri Dagh.
Agri Dagh would have been visible above water even before the ark
landed (Standish and Standish 1999, 236).
The Bible describes a rectangular ark. Wyatt's ark is boat-shaped and
about 50 percent wider than the dimensions given in the Bible (Standish
and Standish 1999, 106, 230-231).
Links:
Collins, L. G. and D. F. Fasold, 1996. Bogus "Noah's Ark" from Turkey
exposed as a common geologic structure. Journal of Geoscience
Education
44(4): 439-444. http://www.csun.edu/~vcgeo005/bogus.html
References:
- Collins and Fasold, 1996. (see above)
- Standish and Standish, 1999. (see below)
Further Reading:
Bailey, Lloyd, 1989. Noah: The Person and the Story in History and
Tradition. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
Standish, Russell R. and Colin D. Standish, 1999. Holy Relics or
Revelation. Rapidan, VA: Hartland Publications, pp. 226-251
created 2001-2-18, modified 2004-11-13