Browse Search Feedback Other Links Home Home The Talk.Origins Archive: Exploring the Creation/Evolution Controversy

Index to Creationist Claims,  edited by Mark Isaak,    Copyright © 2005
Previous Claim: CB805   |   List of Claims   |   Next Claim: CB811

Claim CB810:

Homology is defined as similarity due to common ancestry. The claim then that it is evidence for common ancestry is a circular argument.

Source:

Wells, Jonathan, 2000. Icons of Evolution, Washington DC: Regnery Publishing Inc., pp. 63-65.

Response:

  1. Homology is not defined as similarity due to common ancestry and then used as evidence for common ancestry. Rather, the evidence for common ancestry comes from the patterns of similarity of many traits. These similarities show that organisms group naturally into a nested hierarchy. For example, that ladybugs and scarabs are both types of beetle is based on various common traits such as hardened front wings; beetles, flies, and grasshoppers are types of insect; insects, scorpions, and centipedes are types of arthropod. Such grouping does not depend on any assumptions about origins and in fact was first codified by Linnaeus, a creationist. A grouping suggested by many common traits is evidence of common ancestry. This is true no matter what you choose to call the traits. The homology label gets added after the evidence for common ancestry is already in.

Further Reading:

Mindell, David P. and Axel Meyer. 2001. Homology evolving. Trends in ecology and evolution 16: 434-440.
Previous Claim: CB805   |   List of Claims   |   Next Claim: CB811

created 2001-1-27, modified 2005-2-11